- We will send in 10–14 business days.
/images/books/4178179/9780739103371.jpg)
- Author: Maurice Joly
- Publisher: Lexington Books
- ISBN-10: 0739103377
- ISBN-13: 9780739103371
- Format: 16 x 22.9 x 3.6 cm, hardcover
- Language: English
- SAVE -10% with code: EXTRA
The Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu (e-book) (used book) | bookbook.eu
Reviews
Description
The Dialogue in Hell between Montesquieu and Machiavelli is the source of the world's most infamous literary forgery, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. John Waggoner's superb translation of and commentary on Joly's Dialogue--the first faithful translation in English--seeks not only to update the sordid legacy of the Protocols but to redeem Joly's original work for serious study in its own right, rather than through the lens of antisemitism. Waggoner's work vindicates a man who was neither an antisemite nor a supporter of the kind of tyrannical politics the Protocols subsequently served and presents Maurice Joly, once much maligned and too long ignored, as one of the nineteenth century's foremost political thinkers.
EXTRA 10 % discount with code: EXTRA
The promotion ends in 17d.23:15:22
The discount code is valid when purchasing from 10 €. Discounts do not stack.
- Author: Maurice Joly
- Publisher: Lexington Books
- ISBN-10: 0739103377
- ISBN-13: 9780739103371
- Format: 16 x 22.9 x 3.6 cm, hardcover
- Language: English English
The Dialogue in Hell between Montesquieu and Machiavelli is the source of the world's most infamous literary forgery, The Protocols of the Elders of Zion. John Waggoner's superb translation of and commentary on Joly's Dialogue--the first faithful translation in English--seeks not only to update the sordid legacy of the Protocols but to redeem Joly's original work for serious study in its own right, rather than through the lens of antisemitism. Waggoner's work vindicates a man who was neither an antisemite nor a supporter of the kind of tyrannical politics the Protocols subsequently served and presents Maurice Joly, once much maligned and too long ignored, as one of the nineteenth century's foremost political thinkers.
Reviews